Integrations
Most businesses do not need another system. They need the ones they already have to stop being islands, so that a number entered once does not have to be entered again in three other places.
You probably recognise
- The same data typed into two systems by two people
- A nightly export someone runs by hand
- Reconciliation that exists purely because two systems disagree
- A vendor quoting a large number for a connector that should be simple
Boring on purpose
Good integrations are unglamorous and reliable. They fail loudly rather than silently, retry sensibly, and never quietly drop a record because an API was briefly unavailable. Most integration pain comes from work that was optimistic about failure.
We will tell you when not to
Sometimes the honest answer is that a fifteen-minute manual step is cheaper to keep than to automate. We would rather say that than sell you the integration.
Scope and timeline. Often the smallest and fastest projects we take. Worth asking about even for a narrow annoyance.
Is this the thing costing you the most?
Describe it in a few sentences. We will tell you honestly whether it is worth building, and roughly what it would take.
Start a conversationRelated
- Legacy replacementThe system everyone complains about, replaced without betting the company on a two-year project.
- Warehouse & inventoryKnow what you have, where it is, and what is committed — without a clipboard reconciliation.
- Internal toolsThe spreadsheet five people edit and nobody trusts, turned into something that enforces its own rules.